Leverington Common Rd Wisbech- May 23rd 2016

Location of Sighting: Leverington Common Rd Wisbech PE13 5EW
Date of Sighting: Sunday May 23rd 2016
Time: 9.30pm to 9.45pm
Witness Name: Mr. Karl Zawisza

Witness Statement: I was taking my dogs for their evening comfort break along Leverington Common Rd. It was not yet fully dark and being a Sunday night the road was quiet. As I looked up the road I saw a clump of orange lights coming into view over the trees. We are about 30 miles from Mildenhall and Lakenheath and we often see and hear really noisy military planes flying around in the sky. I stood and looked at these lights which were moving in a westerly direction towards Peterborough and they made no sound whatsoever. I thought it may have been a police helicopter but there were no flashing aviation lights on it. As it veered away slowly gaining height the
orange lights winked out one by one and as it was not totally dark yet I made out a black triangle shape as it made a lazy directional turn downwards and it then vanished into a cloud. You can imagine my surprise when I saw another clump of orange lights come from the same area of the sky as the first one and do exactly the same flight procedure ending with its orange clump of lights winking out one by one. It also banked and revealed a black triangular shape. I continued walking up the road and yet another clump of orange lights came into view from the same place and they too followed the same procedures. In all this happened five times, at intervals of about five minutes between each manifestation. The total silence of these lights was interesting but also they weren’t moving smoothly. Rather it was the sort of motion I can only describe as being akin to rowing a boat, that is pull the oars, go forward slow down and pull the oars again. The dogs didn’t react to the lights and when I got home I told my wife who said we have enough troubles with Brexit to worry about alien craft.My view is that if we were told about ET’s assuming the things I saw were alien transport modules and not some sort of our own military craft the impact would be minuscule. Would it affect my pension, the cost of food and fuel, the immigration crisis, the underfunding of the NHS, street stabbings by sadly disturbed person, school exams and so forth? The answer is a big fat no. So there we are and there is likely a simple explanation. Maybe they were our own military craft returning to base for a tea break and a leak not necessarily in that order. In either event we couldn’t do anything about an ET presence anyway so why worry. What will be will be. Best wishes, Karl

Source:?www.uk-ufo.co.uk

Comment : If you can provide further information on this or other possible UFO sightings in this area then please leave a comment or send details through our “submit sighting” form

Updated: May 25, 2016 — 7:47 pm

25 Comments

Add a Comment
  1. Hello Chris, yes, I’m aware of this much-reported sighting. Surely the logical conclusion is that the witness saw some form of classified (possibly still so) military craft? I have mentioned before a friend of mine who was stationed at Macrihannish, and still can’t tell me what was flying from there.

  2. Hi Steve,

    “Surely the logical conclusion is that the witness saw some form of classified (possibly still so) military craft?”.

    That these sighting of a silent triangular craft was back in 1989 & that the Col & his wife observed this object at a distance between 100/200 meters, and that even though it was a clear moonlight night illuminating the surrounding scenery, the moonlight failed to reflect of this object to reveal it’s shape!.(no shape was ever observed) the Col estimated the three circular lights on the triangle were 10 meters apart, so, one has an idea of the size of the object.It’s also worth pointing out that the
    red light was seen to detach itself from the object and move away.

    Now some sixteen years later, the military still haven’t shown ‘Jo public’ a triangle that is silent, (some have reported a low hum)
    that can ‘fly’ at walking pace, that doesn’t reflect light particles!.
    Is that because it’s that ‘secret’ that the world will never know about it!, every aircraft makes a noise, they all have engine cowlings/wings
    attached to a fuselage for lift, triangle are just that, nothing more, nothing less.

    Some triangle’s have been reported ‘as big as a football pitch’, that’s beyond human comprehension!.

    As I’ve said before, technology moves around the world pretty fast, yet you want me to believe that the military the world over are all in this ‘secret’ together!, sorry Steve, don’t buy it -;).

  3. “As I’ve said before, technology moves around the world pretty fast, yet you want me to believe that the military the world over are all in this ‘secret’ together!, sorry Steve, don’t buy it -;).”

    Yet you ‘buy’ that aliens from space are visiting the planet in huge, football pitch sized craft? Really?

    Are you aware how long the B2 and F117, as well as many other advanced aircraft that were being tested and evaluated back then, flew in absolute secret, from remote bases in the US and here, before entering service? Are you aware how long the B2 – a large, triangular shaped long-distance bomber – was in service before the US military admitted it? Consider the number of years involved – Have Blue, the template for stealth aircraft, first flew in the early 70’s – and why should we NOT be unaware of development aircraft flying today, or years ago? Why should we be aware of advanced, very quiet propulsion systems (which have, in fact, been allegedly fitted to B2’s) that are under development right now, or even thirty years ago? Surely you accept that – and I’ve broached this many times with you – an earthly developed craft is more likely an explanation than one manned by aliens? There’s a sensible explanation, and one less so: I’m happy to believe that an earthly origin is the more sensible one of the two and can’t understand why others don’t!

  4. “Yet you ‘buy’ that aliens from space are visiting the planet in huge, football pitch sized craft? Really?”

    To be honest with you Steve I’m not looking to be a ‘believer’ nor a ‘non beliver’.

    Though you rely on ‘Black Projects’ as an ‘earthly explaination’ for what is seen in our skys, you seem unable to answer how this ‘object’ observed by the Col & his wife didn’t reflect light particles, or how the red light in the central part of the ‘object’ was seen to move away and return to it’s original postion, so, clearly not
    an anti collision beacon then!!.

    You take it as ‘fact’ that you’ve read somewere that B2’s have been fitted with ‘very quiet propulsion systems’, it’s not a ‘fact’, that’s just speculation!. All jet engines run in bearings, suck in vast quantitys of air & are very noisy, and you want me to belive the designers have made a massive leap in jet engine technology that overcomes the aforementioned, and, (more importantly) overcomes the forces of gravity!, I would gently reiterate that this ‘object’ was totally silent!.

  5. Chris, you’re not being honest with either yourself or others; you clearly want to believe, and there’s no harm in that.

    I can’t offer an explanation for the factors you mention as I don’t have one; nor do you. This doesn’t mean the Col. and wife saw something extraterrestrial; nor does it mean what they described is actually what they saw. We are not perfect when it comes to being observers, we see what our brain allows us to see. There are many examples of reports of strange craft that turn out to be something rather less exciting; there’s a well-known example, after all, of lights attached to cars being driven over a hill in a ‘UFO hot spot’ being reported as, of course, UFO’s; I’ll dig out the details when I get a moment. As for me taking as fact that B2’s and silent propulsion systems, no, not at all; I agree it’s speculation. I also believe it entirely possible. You may have read of the ‘silent Vulcan’ – I believe Nemo mentined it in the past – which was often seen (and not heard) in the North West; that was a long time ago! The problem with sound and jet engines is that you don’t always hear and see them at the same time. I just returned from Linconlnshire and a visit to Coningsby; you see Typhoons on approach long before you hear them. As for overcoming the forces of gravity, every aircraft already does so, it’s old hat.

  6. Hi Steve,

    ‘you’re not being honest with either yourself or others; you clearly want to believe, and there’s no harm in that’

    I am unable to agree with you on that statement because that infers that my judgement is biased towards ‘Aliens’
    and that my mind is closed to the ‘rational explainations’ put fowards by others on this great site.(I’m only after the truth, whatever it may be!)

    ‘I can’t offer an explanation for the factors you mention as I don’t have one; nor do you’

    With respect Steve, as you have an interest in this subject, & as a commenter to many posts, offering a ‘rational earthly, explaination’ to me, the fact that this ‘object’ didn’t reflect the moonlight, that alone should be a ‘light bulb’ moment!. (The Col said, he was ‘flabbergasted no surface re-flection and not even a perceptible con-tour! It’s weird’).

    ‘This doesn’t mean the Col. and wife saw something extraterrestrial; nor does it mean what they described is actually what they saw. We are not perfect when it comes to being observers, we see what our brain allows us to see’.

    And that’s the point Steve, the Col & his wife were unable to detect ‘any mass’ behind the lights!, they didn’t in fact ‘see’ anything except the ‘lights’.

    You are no doubt aware of the proximity of the ‘object’ to the Col & his wife, yet you choose to slur there characters (for no good reason) by suggesting that they were both suffering from visual impairment, or were simultaneosly delusional!!.

    Mrs Amond stated. “When it reached the wood, the object seemed to stand still and a very luminous white light was di-rected towards us. I got frightened and said to my husband “start-up”. I didn’t dare to look at it any
    more”.

    With regards to the ‘red light’ that was seen to move away & return to the ‘object’. Isn’t there a question in your mind saying how is that possible?.

    ‘As for me taking as fact that B2’s and silent propulsion systems, no, not at all; I agree it’s speculation. I also believe it entirely possible’.

    Would you be so kind as to explain how!, I’d really love to know!, as would jet engine manufactors!. No more curfews on night flying owing to engine noise! (it would be like manna from heaven for aircraft operators kerrching) ;-).

    ‘As for overcoming the forces of gravity, every aircraft already does so, it’s old hat’

    I would refer you to the above comment by Mrs Amond & the countless observation of witnesses throughout the world of ‘Non Areodynamic objects’ in our skies, that have no right (from an areodynamic point of view) being there!!.

  7. “No more curfews on night flying owing to engine noise!”

    Before I go on, I’d like to pick up on this; have you much experience of military jets, in close proximity? If not, you will be surprised how quiet the modern breed of fighter jet can be (as well as how loud when they want to be!) If you seriously think that baffles to prevent sound have not been used then you’re really behind the times. Also, experiments – actual, flying aircraft – with alternative engine placement to vastly reduce sound have been trued and tested; the aim is to make them silent beyond take off. Google it, there’s plenty out there. Ads for me slurring the col and his wife’s characters, not at all; the account is disputed in many quarters by people who have given it much more attention than you or I, and the distances, size of craft and other factors involved are by no means certain. As said before, we are not great witnesses. Furthermore, an aircraft does not have to be ‘aerodynamic’ to fly; give a box enough lift and can fly. indeed. modern fighter aircraft go against the laws of aerodynamics in many ways to aid manouverability. The Typhoon, for example, couldn’t fly without a couple of thousand computers on board. That an object didn’t reflect the moon is no light bulb moment chris; they just didn’t see the object reflecting the moon. Stealth aircraft, after all, are painted with non-reflective surfaces. It’s nothing new. As has been discussed before, humans are not great observers. Take Rendlesham as an example: the accounts of what was experienced differ greatly from those taken immediately after to those from a long time later (the same, incidentally, is true of Roswell). Strange things are flying in our airspace, without a doubt, but I have a hard time believing they could have come from millions of miles away, rather than one of the hundreds of airfields across the world where aircraft are in development all the time.

  8. Blanket denial is not the way forward here, nor is falling out with one an other, some folks just can’t bring themselves to believe, even if they did witness something for themselves,

    We can not use any kind of human logic here.
    As humanity have had their minds’ brainwashed with the church’s
    indoctrination, that God made the earth, and man in his own image. this has been feed to humanity for hundreds of years.

    then we have the so called scientists and their misinformation
    with their light year theory, also that it would take any other beings an impossible amount of time to travel here to visit us
    here on earth.

    Yet most ufo reports made by pilots stating of craft moving at tremendous speeds.

    So it would seems their technology is far in advanced comparing to our very own.

    Plus we have been moving forward with our own tech in the last 40th years or so.

    So if ‘we’ can move forward so fast, imagine what an advanced nation of beings, from a higher tech civilisation, just what would they be able to do.

    We need to come together and do some investigations before condamnation

  9. Hi Steve,

    ‘Ads for me slurring the col and his wife’s characters, not at all; the account is disputed in many quarters by people who have given it much more attention than you or I, and the distances, size of craft and other factors involved are by no means certain’.

    I can assure you I have given this sighting my full attention!, it intrigues me how the ‘object’ failed to reflect the moonlight. You say that the military can paint an aircraft to make it invisible to radar, but it’s not possible to paint an aircraft to make it invisible to the human eye!.

    You say this sighting is ‘disputed in many quarters’ & that’s the way with this phenonemon, that people choose to disbelieve or interpret what was observed by the Col & his wife. If someone interprets the distances of the lights that formed the triangle then it becomes pure speculation.

    The Col said the distance between the lights (Triangle) was cica 10 metres, but, had he said it was 30 metres distance between the lights, it would have only increased the size of the ‘object’ so, I can’t see how that has a bearing on the case!.

    Though you may keep refering to military jets, you are no doubt aware that this ‘object’ emmited no sound whatsoever!.

    …..’they just didn’t see the object reflecting the moon’.

    Just to be clear here Steve, the Col & his wife never saw an ‘object’ they were unable to see any structure behind the ‘lights’. Again, the Col said, it was ‘“paradoxical” that he can?t see the mass that surrounds the triangle formed by the white light’, (even though the surrouding lanscape was bathed in the full moonlight).

    And finally, a box is incapable of flight owing to the lack of any aerodynamic properties!.

  10. Chris i seen a report of a large triangle craft about 600ft in length landing at raf farnborough late at night there is something getting tested in the uk. I have seen a small triangle which looks dortio shape another which is pointed, & one i just reported from the shape looked a bit like the aircraft called the A12 avenger but the back end was rounded.

    I think there is a triangle aircraft flying about which is a joint USAF & RAF project. As for the large triangle i would like to know where it is based in the uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.